Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Medicina (B.Aires) ; 82(1): 111-116, feb. 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1365135

ABSTRACT

Abstract Stereotactic radiosurgery with gamma knife (GKS) is a treatment option for persistent or recurrent pituitary adenoma. The aim of our study was to report Argentine experience in GKS, assessing the efficacy and safety in our patients with pituitary adenomas. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with pituitary adenomas treated with GKS between 2002 and 2017 in a single institution. Patient characteristics, biochemical remission rate (for functioning tumors), tumor control rate and adverse effects with GKS were inves tigated. The study cohort comprised 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 63 months: 51 somatotropinomas, 28 non-functioning adenomas, 15 corticotropinomas, 2 prolactinomas and 3 mixed pituitary tumors. The mean radiation dose was 30.6Gy for corticotropinomas, 29.3Gy for somatotropinomas and 19.6Gy for non-secreting adenomas. Global tumor control rate was 94.2%. Biochemical remission rate was 55.9%, being higher in acromegaly than in Cushing's disease (OR4.7, 95%Ci 2.1-10.4, p<0.0001). The mean time to remission was 29.5 months (range: 6-156). Hypopituitarism occurred in 26% of patients and those with Cushing's disease were more prone to develop new hormone deficiency after GKS (OR 2.93, 95%Ci 1.2-7.2, p = 0.019). This study shows argentine experience with the use of GKS in patients with pituitary adenomas, with similar results to those reported by centers with large radiosurgical experience. We achieved biochemical remission in more than 50% of patients and global tumor control in most of them. Hypopituitarism was the most frequent adverse effect, while others were infrequent.


Resumen La radiocirugía gamma-knife (GKS) constituye una alternativa de tratamiento en adenomas hipofisarios persis tentes o recurrentes. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo fue comunicar la experiencia argentina con GKS, evaluando eficacia y seguridad en nuestros pacientes con adenomas hipofisarios. Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes con adenomas hipofisarios tratados con GKS entre 2002 y 2017. Se investigaron: características basales, tasa de remisión bioquímica, tasa de control tumoral y efectos adversos del GKS. Estudiamos 99 pa cientes adultos con un seguimiento medio de 63 meses: 51 somatotropinomas, 28 adenomas no funcionantes, 15 corticotropinomas, 2 prolactinomas y 3 tumores mixtos. La do sis media de radiación fue 30.6 Gy para cortico tropinomas, 29.3 Gy para somatotropinomas y 19.6 Gy para adenomas no secretores. La tasa global de control tumoral fue 94.2%. La tasa de remisión bioquímica fue 55.9%, si endo mayor en acromegalia que en enfermedad de Cushing (OR4.7, 95% Ci 2.1-10.4, p < 0.0001). El tiempo medio hasta la remisión fue 29.5 meses (rango: 6-156). Se produjo hipopituitarismo en el 26% de los pacientes. Aquellos con enfermedad de Cushing fueron más propensos a desarrollar nuevas deficiencias hormonales después del GKS (OR2.93, 95% Ci 1.2-7.2, p = 0.019). Este trabajo muestra la experiencia argentina con GKS en pacientes con adenomas hipofisarios, con resultados similares a los reportados por centros con amplia experiencia radioquirúrgica. Logramos remisión bioquímica en más del 50% de los pacientes y control tumoral global en la mayoría de ellos. El hipopituitarismo fue el efecto adverso más frecuente, mientras que otros fueron infrecuentes.

2.
Rev. argent. endocrinol. metab ; 54(4): 169-175, dic. 2017. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-957984

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El riesgo de desarrollar neoplasias colónicas en pacientes acromegálicos y su relación directa con los niveles elevados de GH/IGF-1 no están bien establecidos y continúan siendo motivo de controversia en la literatura mundial. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el riesgo de desarrollar lesiones neoplásicas avanzadas (LNA) (adenomas mayores a 1 cm, componente velloso mayor del 75% y/o displasia de alto grado), en pacientes con acromegalia, comparado con un grupo control. Materiales y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico caso-control retrospectivo. Ciento treinta y siete pacientes con acromegalia que realizaron videocolonoscopia (VCC) fueron incluidos inicialmente, aunque solo 69 cumplieron criterios de inclusión. Sesenta y dos controles fueron obtenidos: por cada caso (paciente con acromegalia) 2 «controles¼ fueron seleccionados aleatorizadamente e igualados por edad y sexo. El riesgo se expresó en odds ratio (OR) y su correspondiente intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%. La significación estadística fue considerada una p < 0,05. Resultados: De los 69 pacientes con VCC completa y datos adecuados para su análisis, 28 presentaron VCC positiva con hallazgos de pólipos (40%) y 41 VCC negativa o normal (60%). Dentro del grupo con VCC positiva, 14 presentaron LNA (20%) y solo un paciente presentó diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal. Para el análisis caso-control se incluyó a 31 pacientes frente al grupo control (n = 62) que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La presencia de pólipos colónicos, adenomas y LNA en los pacientes con acromegalia fue de 19/31 (61,9%), 14/31 (45,16%) y 10/31 (32,25%), y en el grupo control de 18/62 (29,03%), 11/62 (17,74%) y 4/62 (6,45%), respectivamente. El riesgo de adenomas y LNA fue mayor en el grupo de acromegalia en comparación con el grupo control, siendo ambos resultados estadísticamente significativos: adenomas OR 2,54 (IC 1,22-5,25) p = 0,005, LNA OR: 7,3 (2,4-25), p = 0,00. Conclusión: La acromegalia se asocia a un mayor riesgo de lesiones colónicas preneoplásicas. Este hallazgo justifica el cribado con VCC al diagnóstico en pacientes con acromegalia.


Background: The risk of developing cancerous lesions in the colon of acromegaly patients and their direct relationship with elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels is not well established, and is still controversial in the international literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of developing advanced neoplastic lesions (ALN: greater than 1 cm adenomas, villous component greater than 75% and/or high grade dysplasia) in patients with acromegaly compared to a control group. Materials and methods: A multicentre, retrospective case-control study was conducted initially on 137 patients with acromegaly (cases) who underwent videocolonoscopy (VCC), although only 69 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-two controls were obtained, and for each case two "controls" were randomly selected and matched by age and gender. Risk was expressed as odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% con"dence interval (CI). P values < .05 were considered statistical significantly. Results: Of the 69 acromegaly patients with a completed VCC and adequate data for their analysis, 28 had a positive VCC with findings of polyps (40%), and 41 VCC negative with no lesions (60%). Within the group with positive VCC, 14 were ALN (20%) and one a colorectal cancer. In the case-control analysis, 31 cases were to be analysed against the control group (n = 62). The presence of colonic polyps, adenomas, and ALN in patients with acromegaly was 19/31 (61.9%), 14/31 (45.16%), and 10/31 (32.25%), respectively, and in the control group, it was 18/62 (29.03%), 11/62 (17.74%), and 4/62 (6.45%), respectively. The risk of adenomas and ALN was higher in the acromegaly group compared to the control group: adenomas OR: 2.54 (95% CI 1.22-5.25) P=.005, ALN OR: 7.3 (2.4-25) P=.00. Conclusion: This preliminary case control study showed an increased risk of pre-cancerous colprectal lesions in patients with acromegaly, supporting the VCC screening at diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Precancerous Conditions/complications , Acromegaly/complications , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Colonoscopy , Risk Adjustment
3.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 60(1): 42-46, Feb. 2016. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-774618

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objetive The aim was to assess the evolution of tumor size and prolactin (PRL) levels in patients with micro and macroprolactinomas diagnosed and treated with dopamine agonists during fertile age, and the effects of suspension of drugs after menopause. Retrospective study, 29 patients with prolactinomas, 22 microadenomas and 7 macroadenomas, diagnosed during their fertile age were studied in their menopause; treatment was stopped in this period. Age at menopause was 49 ± 3.6 years. The average time of treatment was 135 ± 79 months. The time of follow-up after treatment suspension was 4 to 192 months. Results Pre-treatment PRL levels in micro and macroadenomas were 119 ± 57 ng/mL and 258 ± 225 ng/mL, respectively. During menopause after treatment suspension, and at the latest follow-up: in microadenomas PRL levels were 23 ± 13 ng/mL and 16 ± 5.7 ng/mL, respectively; in macroadenomas, PRL levels were 20 ± 6.6 ng/mL 5t5and 25 ± 18 ng/mL, respectively. In menopause after treatment suspension, the microadenomas had disappeared in 9/22 and had decreased in 13/22. In the group of patients whose tumor had decreased, in the latest follow-up, tumors disappeared in 7/13 and remained unchanged in 6/13. In macroadenomas, after treatment suspension 3/7 had disappeared, 3/7 decreased and 1/7 remained unchanged. In the latest control in the 3 patients whose tumor decreased, disappeared in 1/3, decreased in 1/3 and there was no change in the remaining. Conclusions Normal PRL levels and sustained reduction or disappearance of adenomas were achieved in most of patients, probably due to the decrease of estrogen levels. Dopamine agonists might be stopped after menopause in patients with prolactinomas.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Adenoma/pathology , Disease Progression , Menopause/blood , Pituitary Neoplasms/pathology , Prolactin/blood , Prolactinoma/pathology , Adenoma/blood , Adenoma/drug therapy , Bromocriptine/therapeutic use , Dopamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Ergolines/therapeutic use , Pituitary Neoplasms/blood , Pituitary Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prolactinoma/blood , Prolactinoma/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Withholding Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL